Streaming Complexity of SVMs

July 07, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alexandr Andoni, Collin Burns, Yi Li, Sepideh Mahabadi, David P. Woodruff arXiv ID 2007.03633 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.CG, cs.LG Citations 5 Venue International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study the space complexity of solving the bias-regularized SVM problem in the streaming model. This is a classic supervised learning problem that has drawn lots of attention, including for developing fast algorithms for solving the problem approximately. One of the most widely used algorithms for approximately optimizing the SVM objective is Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), which requires only $O(\frac{1}{λΡ})$ random samples, and which immediately yields a streaming algorithm that uses $O(\frac{d}{λΡ})$ space. For related problems, better streaming algorithms are only known for smooth functions, unlike the SVM objective that we focus on in this work. We initiate an investigation of the space complexity for both finding an approximate optimum of this objective, and for the related ``point estimation'' problem of sketching the data set to evaluate the function value $F_λ$ on any query $(θ, b)$. We show that, for both problems, for dimensions $d=1,2$, one can obtain streaming algorithms with space polynomially smaller than $\frac{1}{λΡ}$, which is the complexity of SGD for strongly convex functions like the bias-regularized SVM, and which is known to be tight in general, even for $d=1$. We also prove polynomial lower bounds for both point estimation and optimization. In particular, for point estimation we obtain a tight bound of $Θ(1/\sqrtΡ)$ for $d=1$ and a nearly tight lower bound of $\widetildeΩ(d/Ρ^2)$ for $d = Ω( \log(1/Ρ))$. Finally, for optimization, we prove a $Ω(1/\sqrtΡ)$ lower bound for $d = Ω( \log(1/Ρ))$, and show similar bounds when $d$ is constant.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted