Efficient Linear and Affine Codes for Correcting Insertions/Deletions

July 17, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Kuan Cheng, Venkatesan Guruswami, Bernhard Haeupler, Xin Li arXiv ID 2007.09075 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.DS, math.CO Citations 34 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
This paper studies \emph{linear} and \emph{affine} error-correcting codes for correcting synchronization errors such as insertions and deletions. We call such codes linear/affine insdel codes. Linear codes that can correct even a single deletion are limited to have information rate at most $1/2$ (achieved by the trivial 2-fold repetition code). Previously, it was (erroneously) reported that more generally no non-trivial linear codes correcting $k$ deletions exist, i.e., that the $(k+1)$-fold repetition codes and its rate of $1/(k+1)$ are basically optimal for any $k$. We disprove this and show the existence of binary linear codes of length $n$ and rate just below $1/2$ capable of correcting $ฮฉ(n)$ insertions and deletions. This identifies rate $1/2$ as a sharp threshold for recovery from deletions for linear codes, and reopens the quest for a better understanding of the capabilities of linear codes for correcting insertions/deletions. We prove novel outer bounds and existential inner bounds for the rate vs. (edit) distance trade-off of linear insdel codes. We complement our existential results with an efficient synchronization-string-based transformation that converts any asymptotically-good linear code for Hamming errors into an asymptotically-good linear code for insdel errors. Lastly, we show that the $\frac{1}{2}$-rate limitation does not hold for affine codes by giving an explicit affine code of rate $1-ฮต$ which can efficiently correct a constant fraction of insdel errors.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Information Theory

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted