Soft Sequence Heaps

August 12, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Gerth StΓΈlting Brodal arXiv ID 2008.05398 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Chazelle [JACM00] introduced the soft heap as a building block for efficient minimum spanning tree algorithms, and recently Kaplan et al. [SOSA2019] showed how soft heaps can be applied to achieve simpler algorithms for various selection problems. A soft heap trades-off accuracy for efficiency, by allowing $Ξ΅N$ of the items in a heap to be corrupted after a total of $N$ insertions, where a corrupted item is an item with artificially increased key and $0 < Ξ΅\leq 1/2$ is a fixed error parameter. Chazelle's soft heaps are based on binomial trees and support insertions in amortized $O(\lg(1/Ξ΅))$ time and extract-min operations in amortized $O(1)$ time. In this paper we explore the design space of soft heaps. The main contribution of this paper is an alternative soft heap implementation based on merging sorted sequences, with time bounds matching those of Chazelle's soft heaps. We also discuss a variation of the soft heap by Kaplan et al. [SICOMP2013], where we avoid performing insertions lazily. It is based on ternary trees instead of binary trees and matches the time bounds of Kaplan et al., i.e. amortized $O(1)$ insertions and amortized $O(\lg(1/Ξ΅))$ extract-min. Both our data structures only introduce corruptions after extract-min operations which return the set of items corrupted by the operation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted