Can determinism and compositionality coexist in RML? (extended version)

August 14, 2020 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Combined International Workshop Expressiveness Concurrency and Workshop Structural Operational Semantics

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Davide Ancona, Angelo Ferrando, Viviana Mascardi arXiv ID 2008.06453 Category cs.LO: Logic in CS Cross-listed cs.PL Citations 0 Venue Combined International Workshop Expressiveness Concurrency and Workshop Structural Operational Semantics Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Runtime verification (RV) consists in dynamically verifying that the event traces generated by single runs of a system under scrutiny (SUS) are compliant with the formal specification of its expected properties. RML (Runtime Monitoring Language) is a simple but expressive Domain Specific Language for RV; its semantics is based on a trace calculus formalized by a deterministic rewriting system which drives the implementation of the interpreter of the monitors generated by the RML compiler from the specifications. While determinism of the trace calculus ensures better performances of the generated monitors, it makes the semantics of its operators less intuitive. In this paper we move a first step towards a compositional semantics of the RML trace calculus, by interpreting its basic operators as operations on sets of instantiated event traces and by proving that such an interpretation is equivalent to the operational semantics of the calculus.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Logic in CS