Early RTL Analysis for SCA Vulnerability in Fuzzy Extractors of Memory-Based PUF Enabled Devices

August 19, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration of System-on-Chip

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xinhui Lai, Maksim Jenihhin, Georgios Selimis, Sven Goossens, Roel Maes, Kolin Paul arXiv ID 2008.08409 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 3 Venue IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration of System-on-Chip Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) are gaining attention in the cryptography community because of the ability to efficiently harness the intrinsic variability in the manufacturing process. However, this means that they are noisy devices and require error correction mechanisms, e.g., by employing Fuzzy Extractors (FEs). Recent works demonstrated that applying FEs for error correction may enable new opportunities to break the PUFs if no countermeasures are taken. In this paper, we address an attack model on FEs hardware implementations and provide a solution for early identification of the timing Side-Channel Attack (SCA) vulnerabilities which can be exploited by physical fault injection. The significance of this work stems from the fact that FEs are an essential building block in the implementations of PUF-enabled devices. The information leaked through the timing side-channel during the error correction process can reveal the FE input data and thereby can endanger revealing secrets. Therefore, it is very important to identify the potential leakages early in the process during RTL design. Experimental results based on RTL analysis of several Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) and Reed-Solomon decoders for PUF-enabled devices with FEs demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted