Differentiating a Tensor Language

August 25, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Gilbert Bernstein, Michael Mara, Tzu-Mao Li, Dougal Maclaurin, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley arXiv ID 2008.11256 Category cs.PL: Programming Languages Cross-listed cs.GR Citations 12 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
How does one compile derivatives of tensor programs, such that the resulting code is purely functional (hence easier to optimize and parallelize) and provably efficient relative to the original program? We show that naively differentiating tensor code---as done in popular systems like Tensorflow and PyTorch---can cause asymptotic slowdowns in pathological cases, violating the Cheap Gradients Principle. However, all existing automatic differentiation methods that guarantee this principle (for variable size data) do so by relying on += mutation through aliases/pointers---which complicates downstream optimization. We provide the first purely functional, provably efficient, adjoint/reverse-mode derivatives of array/tensor code by explicitly accounting for sparsity. We do this by focusing on the indicator function from Iverson's APL. We also introduce a new "Tensor SSA" normal form and a new derivation of reverse-mode automatic differentiation based on the universal property of inner-products.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Programming Languages

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted