๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Can determinism and compositionality coexist in RML?
August 31, 2020 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ EPTCS 322, 2020, pp. 13-32
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Davide Ancona, Angelo Ferrando, Viviana Mascardi
arXiv ID
2009.00391
Category
cs.LO: Logic in CS
Cross-listed
cs.PL
Citations
0
Venue
EPTCS 322, 2020, pp. 13-32
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Runtime verification (RV) consists in dynamically verifying that the event traces generated by single runs of a system under scrutiny (SUS) are compliant with the formal specification of its expected properties. RML (Runtime Monitoring Language) is a simple but expressive Domain Specific Language for RV; its semantics is based on a trace calculus formalized by a deterministic rewriting system which drives the implementation of the interpreter of the monitors generated by the RML compiler from the specifications. While determinism of the trace calculus ensures better performances of the generated monitors, it makes the semantics of its operators less intuitive. In this paper we move a first step towards a compositional semantics of the RML trace calculus, by interpreting its basic operators as operations on sets of instantiated event traces and by proving that such an interpretation is equivalent to the operational semantics of the calculus.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Logic in CS
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networks
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Heterogeneous substitution systems revisited
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Omega-Regular Objectives in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal