Why should I not follow you? Reasons For and Reasons Against in Responsible Recommender Systems

September 03, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Gustavo Padilha Polleti, Douglas Luan de Souza, Fabio Cozman arXiv ID 2009.01953 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.IR, cs.SI Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A few Recommender Systems (RS) resort to explanations so as to enhance trust in recommendations. However, current techniques for explanation generation tend to strongly uphold the recommended products instead of presenting both reasons for and reasons against them. We argue that an RS can better enhance overall trust and transparency by frankly displaying both kinds of reasons to users.We have developed such an RS by exploiting knowledge graphs and by applying Snedegar's theory of practical reasoning. We show that our implemented RS has excellent performance and we report on an experiment with human subjects that shows the value of presenting both reasons for and against, with significant improvements in trust, engagement, and persuasion.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted