Supporting Expert Close Analysis of Historical Scientific Writings: A Case Study for Near-by Reading

September 04, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2020 IEEE 5th Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Andrew McNutt, Agatha Kim, Sergio Elahi, Kazutaka Takahashi arXiv ID 2009.02384 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 4 Venue 2020 IEEE 5th Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Distant reading methodologies make use of computational processes to aid in the analysis of large text corpora which might not be pliable to traditional methods of scholarly analysis due to their volume. While these methods have been applied effectively to a variety of types of texts and contexts, they can leave unaddressed the needs of scholars in the humanities disciplines like history, who often engage in close reading of sources. Complementing the close analysis of texts with some of the tools of distant reading, such as visualization, can resolve some of the issues. We focus on a particular category of this intersection---which we refer to as near-by reading---wherein an expert engages in a computer-mediated analysis of a text with which they are familiar. We provide an example of this approach by developing a visual analysis application for the near-by reading of 19th-century scientific writings by J. W. von Goethe and A. P. de Candolle. We show that even the most formal and public texts, such as scientific treatises, can reveal unexpressed personal biases and philosophies that the authors themselves might not have recognized.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted