Variable Binding for Sparse Distributed Representations: Theory and Applications

September 14, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors E. Paxon Frady, Denis Kleyko, Friedrich T. Sommer arXiv ID 2009.06734 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 62 Venue IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Symbolic reasoning and neural networks are often considered incompatible approaches. Connectionist models known as Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSAs) can potentially bridge this gap. However, classical VSAs and neural networks are still considered incompatible. VSAs encode symbols by dense pseudo-random vectors, where information is distributed throughout the entire neuron population. Neural networks encode features locally, often forming sparse vectors of neural activation. Following Rachkovskij (2001); Laiho et al. (2015), we explore symbolic reasoning with sparse distributed representations. The core operations in VSAs are dyadic operations between vectors to express variable binding and the representation of sets. Thus, algebraic manipulations enable VSAs to represent and process data structures in a vector space of fixed dimensionality. Using techniques from compressed sensing, we first show that variable binding between dense vectors in VSAs is mathematically equivalent to tensor product binding between sparse vectors, an operation which increases dimensionality. This result implies that dimensionality-preserving binding for general sparse vectors must include a reduction of the tensor matrix into a single sparse vector. Two options for sparsity-preserving variable binding are investigated. One binding method for general sparse vectors extends earlier proposals to reduce the tensor product into a vector, such as circular convolution. The other method is only defined for sparse block-codes, block-wise circular convolution. Our experiments reveal that variable binding for block-codes has ideal properties, whereas binding for general sparse vectors also works, but is lossy, similar to previous proposals. We demonstrate a VSA with sparse block-codes in example applications, cognitive reasoning and classification, and discuss its relevance for neuroscience and neural networks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Neural & Evolutionary

๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฎ The Ethereal

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE ๐Ÿ› IEEE TNNLS ๐Ÿ“š 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted