Variable Binding for Sparse Distributed Representations: Theory and Applications
September 14, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
E. Paxon Frady, Denis Kleyko, Friedrich T. Sommer
arXiv ID
2009.06734
Category
cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
62
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Symbolic reasoning and neural networks are often considered incompatible approaches. Connectionist models known as Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSAs) can potentially bridge this gap. However, classical VSAs and neural networks are still considered incompatible. VSAs encode symbols by dense pseudo-random vectors, where information is distributed throughout the entire neuron population. Neural networks encode features locally, often forming sparse vectors of neural activation. Following Rachkovskij (2001); Laiho et al. (2015), we explore symbolic reasoning with sparse distributed representations. The core operations in VSAs are dyadic operations between vectors to express variable binding and the representation of sets. Thus, algebraic manipulations enable VSAs to represent and process data structures in a vector space of fixed dimensionality. Using techniques from compressed sensing, we first show that variable binding between dense vectors in VSAs is mathematically equivalent to tensor product binding between sparse vectors, an operation which increases dimensionality. This result implies that dimensionality-preserving binding for general sparse vectors must include a reduction of the tensor matrix into a single sparse vector. Two options for sparsity-preserving variable binding are investigated. One binding method for general sparse vectors extends earlier proposals to reduce the tensor product into a vector, such as circular convolution. The other method is only defined for sparse block-codes, block-wise circular convolution. Our experiments reveal that variable binding for block-codes has ideal properties, whereas binding for general sparse vectors also works, but is lossy, similar to previous proposals. We demonstrate a VSA with sparse block-codes in example applications, cognitive reasoning and classification, and discuss its relevance for neuroscience and neural networks.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Neural & Evolutionary
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units (ReLU)
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Generative Adversarial Text to Image Synthesis
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Search
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learning
๐
๐
Old Age
Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted