Funding CRISPR: Understanding the role of government and philanthropic institutions in supporting academic research within the CRISPR innovation system
September 24, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Quantitative Science Studies
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
David Fajardo-Ortiz, Stefan Hornbostel, Maywa Montenegro-de-Wit, Annie Shattuck
arXiv ID
2009.11920
Category
cs.DL: Digital Libraries
Cross-listed
cs.SI
Citations
9
Venue
Quantitative Science Studies
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas has the potential to revolutionize medicine, agriculture, and biology. Understanding the trajectory of CRISPR research, how it is influenced and who pays for it, is an essential research policy question. We use a combination of methods to map, via quantitative content analysis of CRISPR papers, the research funding profile of major government agencies and organizations philanthropic, and the networks involved in supporting key stages of high-influence research, namely basic biological research and technological development. The results of the content analysis show how the research supported by the main US government agencies focus both on the study of CRISPR as a biological phenomenon and on its technological development and use as a biomedical research tool. US philanthropic organizations with the exception of HHMI, tend, by contrast, to specialize in funding CRISPR as a genome editing technology. We present a model of co-funding networks at the two most prominent institutions for CRISPR/Cas research, the University of California and the Harvard/MIT/Broad Institute, to illuminate how philanthropic organizations have articulated with government agencies to co-finance the discovery and development of CRISPR/Cas. Our results raise fundamental questions about the role of the state and the influence of philanthropy over the trajectory of transformative technologies.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Digital Libraries
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to 2023
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
On the Performance of Hybrid Search Strategies for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Systematic Identification and Analysis of Scientists on Twitter
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted