A Ranking-based, Balanced Loss Function Unifying Classification and Localisation in Object Detection

September 28, 2020 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐Ÿ› Neural Information Processing Systems

๐ŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era โ€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (โ‰ฅ5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: .gitignore, LICENSE, README.md, assets, configs, demo, docker, docs, mmdet, pytest.ini, requirements.txt, requirements, setup.py, tests, tools

Authors Kemal Oksuz, Baris Can Cam, Emre Akbas, Sinan Kalkan arXiv ID 2009.13592 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Citations 48 Venue Neural Information Processing Systems Repository https://github.com/kemaloksuz/aLRPLoss โญ 138 Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
We propose average Localisation-Recall-Precision (aLRP), a unified, bounded, balanced and ranking-based loss function for both classification and localisation tasks in object detection. aLRP extends the Localisation-Recall-Precision (LRP) performance metric (Oksuz et al., 2018) inspired from how Average Precision (AP) Loss extends precision to a ranking-based loss function for classification (Chen et al., 2020). aLRP has the following distinct advantages: (i) aLRP is the first ranking-based loss function for both classification and localisation tasks. (ii) Thanks to using ranking for both tasks, aLRP naturally enforces high-quality localisation for high-precision classification. (iii) aLRP provides provable balance between positives and negatives. (iv) Compared to on average $\sim$6 hyperparameters in the loss functions of state-of-the-art detectors, aLRP Loss has only one hyperparameter, which we did not tune in practice. On the COCO dataset, aLRP Loss improves its ranking-based predecessor, AP Loss, up to around $5$ AP points, achieves $48.9$ AP without test time augmentation and outperforms all one-stage detectors. Code available at: https://github.com/kemaloksuz/aLRPLoss .
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computer Vision