ReactiFi: Reactive Programming of Wi-Fi Firmware on Mobile Devices
October 01, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π The Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Artur Sterz, Matthias Eichholz, Ragnar Mogk, Lars BaumgΓ€rtner, Pablo Graubner, Matthias Hollick, Mira Mezini, Bernd Freisleben
arXiv ID
2010.00354
Category
cs.PL: Programming Languages
Cross-listed
cs.NI
Citations
8
Venue
The Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Network programmability will be required to handle future increased network traffic and constantly changing application needs. However, there is currently no way of using a high-level, easy to use programming language to program Wi-Fi firmware. This impedes rapid prototyping and deployment of novel network services/applications and hinders continuous performance optimization in Wi-Fi networks, since expert knowledge is required for both the used hardware platforms and the Wi-Fi domain. In this paper, we present ReactiFi, a high-level reactive programming language to program Wi-Fi chips on mobile consumer devices. ReactiFi enables programmers to implement extensions of PHY, MAC, and IP layer mechanisms without requiring expert knowledge of Wi-Fi chips, allowing for novel applications and network protocols. ReactiFi programs are executed directly on the Wi-Fi chip, improving performance and power consumption compared to execution on the main CPU. ReactiFi is conceptually similar to functional reactive languages, but is dedicated to the domain-specific needs of Wi-Fi firmware. First, it handles low-level platform-specific details without interfering with the core functionality of Wi-Fi chips. Second, it supports static reasoning about memory usage of applications, which is important for typically memory-constrained Wi-Fi chips. Third, it limits dynamic changes of dependencies between computations to dynamic branching, in order to enable static reasoning about the order of computations. We evaluate ReactiFi empirically in two real-world case studies. Our results show that throughput, latency, and power consumption are significantly improved when executing applications on the Wi-Fi chip rather than in the operating system kernel or in user space. Moreover, we show that the high-level programming abstractions of ReactiFi have no performance overhead compared to manually written C code.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Programming Languages
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Tensor Comprehensions: Framework-Agnostic High-Performance Machine Learning Abstractions
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Glow: Graph Lowering Compiler Techniques for Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Learnable Programming: Blocks and Beyond
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Vandal: A Scalable Security Analysis Framework for Smart Contracts
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted