A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects

October 08, 2020 Β· The Cartographer Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper β€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Amir-Hossein Karimi, Gilles Barthe, Bernhard SchΓΆlkopf, Isabel Valera arXiv ID 2010.04050 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI, stat.ML Citations 186 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 1 day ago
Abstract
Machine learning is increasingly used to inform decision-making in sensitive situations where decisions have consequential effects on individuals' lives. In these settings, in addition to requiring models to be accurate and robust, socially relevant values such as fairness, privacy, accountability, and explainability play an important role for the adoption and impact of said technologies. In this work, we focus on algorithmic recourse, which is concerned with providing explanations and recommendations to individuals who are unfavourably treated by automated decision-making systems. We first perform an extensive literature review, and align the efforts of many authors by presenting unified definitions, formulations, and solutions to recourse. Then, we provide an overview of the prospective research directions towards which the community may engage, challenging existing assumptions and making explicit connections to other ethical challenges such as security, privacy, and fairness.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Machine Learning