Automatically Deriving Control-Flow Graph Generators from Operational Semantics

October 10, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proc. ACM Program. Lang.

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors James Koppel, Jackson Kearl, Armando Solar-Lezama arXiv ID 2010.04918 Category cs.PL: Programming Languages Citations 5 Venue Proc. ACM Program. Lang. Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We develop the first theory of control-flow graphs from first principles, and use it to create an algorithm for automatically synthesizing many variants of control-flow graph generators from a language's operational semantics. Our approach first introduces a new algorithm for converting a large class of small-step operational semantics to an abstract machine. It next uses a technique called "abstract rewriting" to automatically abstract the semantics of a language, which is used both to directly generate a CFG from a program ("interpreted mode") and to generate standalone code, similar to a human-written CFG generator, for any program in a language. We show how the choice of two abstraction and projection parameters allow our approach to synthesize several families of CFG-generators useful for different kinds of tools. We prove the correspondence between the generated graphs and the original semantics. We provide and prove an algorithm for automatically proving the termination of interpreted-mode generators. In addition to our theoretical results, we have implemented this algorithm in a tool called Mandate, and show that it produces human-readable code on two medium-size languages with 60-80 rules, featuring nearly all intraprocedural control constructs common in modern languages. We then showed these CFG-generators were sufficient to build two static analyzers atop them. Our work is a promising step towards the grand vision of being able to synthesize all desired tools from the semantics of a programming language.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Programming Languages

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted