Jointly Optimizing Sensing Pipelines for Multimodal Mixed Reality Interaction
October 13, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Darshana Rathnayake, Ashen de Silva, Dasun Puwakdandawa, Lakmal Meegahapola, Archan Misra, Indika Perera
arXiv ID
2010.06584
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
3
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Natural human interactions for Mixed Reality Applications are overwhelmingly multimodal: humans communicate intent and instructions via a combination of visual, aural and gestural cues. However, supporting low-latency and accurate comprehension of such multimodal instructions (MMI), on resource-constrained wearable devices, remains an open challenge, especially as the state-of-the-art comprehension techniques for each individual modality increasingly utilize complex Deep Neural Network models. We demonstrate the possibility of overcoming the core limitation of latency--vs.--accuracy tradeoff by exploiting cross-modal dependencies -- i.e., by compensating for the inferior performance of one model with an increased accuracy of more complex model of a different modality. We present a sensor fusion architecture that performs MMI comprehension in a quasi-synchronous fashion, by fusing visual, speech and gestural input. The architecture is reconfigurable and supports dynamic modification of the complexity of the data processing pipeline for each individual modality in response to contextual changes. Using a representative "classroom" context and a set of four common interaction primitives, we then demonstrate how the choices between low and high complexity models for each individual modality are coupled. In particular, we show that (a) a judicious combination of low and high complexity models across modalities can offer a dramatic 3-fold decrease in comprehension latency together with an increase 10-15% in accuracy, and (b) the right collective choice of models is context dependent, with the performance of some model combinations being significantly more sensitive to changes in scene context or choice of interaction.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted