Learning Sparse Graph Laplacian with K Eigenvector Prior via Iterative GLASSO and Projection

October 25, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Saghar Bagheri, Gene Cheung, Antonio Ortega, Fen Wang arXiv ID 2010.13179 Category eess.SP: Signal Processing Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 6 Venue IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Learning a suitable graph is an important precursor to many graph signal processing (GSP) pipelines, such as graph spectral signal compression and denoising. Previous graph learning algorithms either i) make some assumptions on connectivity (e.g., graph sparsity), or ii) make simple graph edge assumptions such as positive edges only. In this paper, given an empirical covariance matrix $\bar{C}$ computed from data as input, we consider a structural assumption on the graph Laplacian matrix $L$: the first $K$ eigenvectors of $L$ are pre-selected, e.g., based on domain-specific criteria, such as computation requirement, and the remaining eigenvectors are then learned from data. One example use case is image coding, where the first eigenvector is pre-chosen to be constant, regardless of available observed data. We first prove that the subspace of symmetric positive semi-definite (PSD) matrices $H_{u}^+$ with the first $K$ eigenvectors being $\{u_k\}$ in a defined Hilbert space is a convex cone. We then construct an operator to project a given positive definite (PD) matrix $L$ to $H_{u}^+$, inspired by the Gram-Schmidt procedure. Finally, we design an efficient hybrid graphical lasso/projection algorithm to compute the most suitable graph Laplacian matrix $L^* \in H_{u}^+$ given $\bar{C}$. Experimental results show that given the first $K$ eigenvectors as a prior, our algorithm outperforms competing graph learning schemes using a variety of graph comparison metrics.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Signal Processing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted