A Combinatorial Cut-Toggling Algorithm for Solving Laplacian Linear Systems
October 30, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Algorithmica
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Monika Henzinger, Billy Jin, Richard Peng, David P. Williamson
arXiv ID
2010.16316
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
6
Venue
Algorithmica
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Over the last two decades, a significant line of work in theoretical algorithms has made progress in solving linear systems whose coefficient matrix is the Laplacian matrix of a weighted graph. The solution of the linear system can be interpreted as the potentials of an electrical flow. Kelner, Orrechia, Sidford, and Zhu (STOC 2013) give a combinatorial, near-linear time algorithm that maintains the Kirchoff Current Law, and gradually enforces the Kirchoff Potential Law by updating flows around cycles (cycle toggling). In this paper, we consider a dual version of the algorithm that maintains the Kirchoff Potential Law, and gradually enforces the Kirchoff Current Law by cut toggling: each iteration updates all potentials on one side of a fundamental cut of a spanning tree by the same amount. We prove that this dual algorithm also runs in a near-linear number of iterations. We show, however, that if we abstract cut toggling as a natural data structure problem, this problem can be reduced to the online vector-matrix-vector problem, which has been conjectured to be difficult for dynamic algorithms by Henzinger, Krinninger, Nanongkai, and Saranurak (STOC 2015). The conjecture implies that a straightforward implementation of the cut-toggling algorithm requires essentially linear time per iteration. To circumvent the lower bound, we batch update steps, and perform them simultaneously instead of sequentially. An appropriate choice of batching leads to an $\tilde{O}(m^{1.5})$ time cut-toggling algorithm for solving Laplacian systems. Furthermore, if we sparsify the graph and call our algorithm recursively on the Laplacian system implied by batching and sparsifying, the running time can be reduced to $O(m^{1+Ξ΅})$ for any $Ξ΅> 0$. Thus, the dual cut-toggling algorithm can achieve (almost) the same running time as its primal cycle-toggling counterpart.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted