A Review On Software Defects Prediction Methods

October 30, 2020 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A Review On Software Defects Prediction Methods"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mitt Shah, Nandit Pujara arXiv ID 2011.00998 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 7 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 days ago
Abstract
Software quality is one of the essential aspects of a software. With increasing demand, software designs are becoming more complex, increasing the probability of software defects. Testers improve the quality of software by fixing defects. Hence the analysis of defects significantly improves software quality. The complexity of software also results in a higher number of defects, and thus manual detection can become a very time-consuming process. This gave researchers incentives to develop techniques for automatic software defects detection. In this paper, we try to analyze the state of the art machine learning algorithms' performance for software defect classification. We used seven datasets from the NASA promise dataset repository for this research work. The performance of Neural Networks and Gradient Boosting classifier dominated other algorithms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Software Engineering