A Review On Software Defects Prediction Methods
October 30, 2020 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A Review On Software Defects Prediction Methods"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Mitt Shah, Nandit Pujara
arXiv ID
2011.00998
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
7
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 days ago
Abstract
Software quality is one of the essential aspects of a software. With increasing demand, software designs are becoming more complex, increasing the probability of software defects. Testers improve the quality of software by fixing defects. Hence the analysis of defects significantly improves software quality. The complexity of software also results in a higher number of defects, and thus manual detection can become a very time-consuming process. This gave researchers incentives to develop techniques for automatic software defects detection. In this paper, we try to analyze the state of the art machine learning algorithms' performance for software defect classification. We used seven datasets from the NASA promise dataset repository for this research work. The performance of Neural Networks and Gradient Boosting classifier dominated other algorithms.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Software Engineering
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
๐
๐
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted