Classification of Periodic Variable Stars with Novel Cyclic-Permutation Invariant Neural Networks

November 02, 2020 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐Ÿ› Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

๐ŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era โ€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (โ‰ฅ5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: README.md, _train.py, data.py, data, data_ppmnist.py, environment.yml, light_curve.py, model, ppmnist.py, ppmnist.sh, requirements.txt, train.py, trained_networks.tar, util.py, variablestar.sh

Authors Keming Zhang, Joshua S. Bloom arXiv ID 2011.01243 Category astro-ph.IM Cross-listed astro-ph.SR, cs.LG, physics.data-an Citations 12 Venue Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Repository https://github.com/kmzzhang/periodicnetwork โญ 12 Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Neural networks (NNs) have been shown to be competitive against state-of-the-art feature engineering and random forest (RF) classification of periodic variable stars. Although previous work utilising NNs has made use of periodicity by period folding multiple-cycle time-series into a single cycle -- from time-space to phase-space -- no approach to date has taken advantage of the fact that network predictions should be invariant to the initial phase of the period-folded sequence. Initial phase is exogenous to the physical origin of the variability and should thus be factored out. Here, we present cyclic-permutation invariant networks, a novel class of NNs for which invariance to phase shifts is guaranteed through polar coordinate convolutions, which we implement by means of "Symmetry Padding." Across three different datasets of variable star light curves, we show that two implementations of the cyclic-permutation invariant network: the iTCN and the iResNet, consistently outperform non-invariant baselines and reduce overall error rates by between 4% to 22%. Over a 10-class OGLE-III sample, the iTCN/iResNet achieves an average per-class accuracy of 93.4%/93.3%, compared to RNN/RF accuracies of 70.5%/89.5% in a recent study using the same data. Finding improvement on a non-astronomy benchmark, we suggest that the methodology introduced here should also be applicable to a wide range of science domains where periodic data abounds due to physical symmetries.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” astro-ph.IM