Improved unsupervised physics-informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients
November 03, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Misha P. T. Kaandorp, Sebastiano Barbieri, Remy Klaassen, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Hans Crezee, Peter T. While, Aart J. Nederveen, Oliver J. Gurney-Champion
arXiv ID
2011.01689
Category
physics.med-ph
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
q-bio.QM
Citations
85
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
${\bf Purpose}$: Earlier work showed that IVIM-NET$_{orig}$, an unsupervised physics-informed deep neural network, was more accurate than other state-of-the-art intravoxel-incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting approaches to DWI. This study presents an improved version: IVIM-NET$_{optim}$, and characterizes its superior performance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. ${\bf Method}$: In simulations (SNR=20), the accuracy, independence and consistency of IVIM-NET were evaluated for combinations of hyperparameters (fit S0, constraints, network architecture, # hidden layers, dropout, batch normalization, learning rate), by calculating the NRMSE, Spearman's $Ο$, and the coefficient of variation (CV$_{NET}$), respectively. The best performing network, IVIM-NET$_{optim}$ was compared to least squares (LS) and a Bayesian approach at different SNRs. IVIM-NET$_{optim}$'s performance was evaluated in 23 PDAC patients. 14 of the patients received no treatment between scan sessions and 9 received chemoradiotherapy between sessions. Intersession within-subject standard deviations (wSD) and treatment-induced changes were assessed. ${\bf Results}$: In simulations, IVIM-NET$_{optim}$ outperformed IVIM-NET$_{orig}$ in accuracy (NRMSE(D)=0.18 vs 0.20; NMRSE(f)=0.22 vs 0.27; NMRSE(D*)=0.39 vs 0.39), independence ($Ο$(D*,f)=0.22 vs 0.74) and consistency (CV$_{NET}$ (D)=0.01 vs 0.10; CV$_{NET}$ (f)=0.02 vs 0.05; CV$_{NET}$ (D*)=0.04 vs 0.11). IVIM-NET$_{optim}$ showed superior performance to the LS and Bayesian approaches at SNRs<50. In vivo, IVIM-NET$_{optim}$ sshowed significantly less noisy parameter maps with lower wSD for D and f than the alternatives. In the treated cohort, IVIM-NET$_{optim}$ detected the most individual patients with significant parameter changes compared to day-to-day variations. ${\bf Conclusion}$: IVIM-NET$_{optim}$ is recommended for IVIM fitting to DWI data.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.med-ph
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Gibbs-Ringing Artifact Removal Based on Local Subvoxel-shifts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning-enabled Virtual Histological Staining of Biological Samples
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Eigenspectra optoacoustic tomography achieves quantitative blood oxygenation imaging deep in tissues
π
π
The Cartographer
Deep learning for biomedical photoacoustic imaging: A review
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: a multicohort study
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted