Approximating the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem with bounded depth

November 04, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Mathematical programming

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Siad Daboul, Stephan Held, Jens Vygen arXiv ID 2011.02446 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM, math.CO Citations 2 Venue Mathematical programming Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We revisit the deadline version of the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem for the special case of bounded depth. Such instances occur for example in VLSI design. The depth of an instance is the number of jobs in a longest chain and is denoted by $d$. We prove new upper and lower bounds on the approximability. First we observe that the problem can be regarded as a special case of finding a minimum-weight vertex cover in a $d$-partite hypergraph. Next, we study the natural LP relaxation, which can be solved in polynomial time for fixed $d$ and -- for time-cost tradeoff instances -- up to an arbitrarily small error in general. Improving on prior work of LovΓ‘sz and of Aharoni, Holzman and Krivelevich, we describe a deterministic algorithm with approximation ratio slightly less than $\frac{d}{2}$ for minimum-weight vertex cover in $d$-partite hypergraphs for fixed $d$ and given $d$-partition. This is tight and yields also a $\frac{d}{2}$-approximation algorithm for general time-cost tradeoff instances. We also study the inapproximability and show that no better approximation ratio than $\frac{d+2}{4}$ is possible, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture and $\text{P}\neq\text{NP}$. This strengthens a result of Svensson, who showed that under the same assumptions no constant-factor approximation algorithm exists for general time-cost tradeoff instances (of unbounded depth). Previously, only APX-hardness was known for bounded depth.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted