Pitfalls in Machine Learning Research: Reexamining the Development Cycle

November 04, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ICBINB@NeurIPS

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Stella Biderman, Walter J. Scheirer arXiv ID 2011.02832 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed stat.ME, stat.ML Citations 26 Venue ICBINB@NeurIPS Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Machine learning has the potential to fuel further advances in data science, but it is greatly hindered by an ad hoc design process, poor data hygiene, and a lack of statistical rigor in model evaluation. Recently, these issues have begun to attract more attention as they have caused public and embarrassing issues in research and development. Drawing from our experience as machine learning researchers, we follow the machine learning process from algorithm design to data collection to model evaluation, drawing attention to common pitfalls and providing practical recommendations for improvements. At each step, case studies are introduced to highlight how these pitfalls occur in practice, and where things could be improved.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted