Answer Graph: Factorization Matters in Large Graphs

November 10, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Extending Database Technology

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zahid Abul-Basher, Nikolay Yakovets, Parke Godfrey, Stanley Clark, Mark Chignell arXiv ID 2011.04838 Category cs.DB: Databases Citations 5 Venue International Conference on Extending Database Technology Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Our answer-graph method to evaluate SPARQL conjunctive queries (CQs) finds a factorized answer set first, an answer graph, and then finds the embedding tuples from this. This approach can reduce greatly the cost to evaluate CQs. This affords a second advantage: we can construct a cost-based planner. We present the answer-graph approach, and overview our prototype system, Wireframe. We then offer proof of concept via a micro-benchmark over the YAGO2s dataset with two prevalent shapes of queries, snowflake and diamond. We compare Wireframe's performance over these against PostgreSQL, Virtuoso, MonetDB, and Neo4J to illustrate the performance advantages of our answer-graph approach.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Databases

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted