Tight Distributed Listing of Cliques

November 14, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Keren Censor-Hillel, Yi-Jun Chang, FranΓ§ois Le Gall, Dean Leitersdorf arXiv ID 2011.07405 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Citations 22 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Much progress has recently been made in understanding the complexity landscape of subgraph finding problems in the CONGEST model of distributed computing. However, so far, very few tight bounds are known in this area. For triangle (i.e., 3-clique) listing, an optimal $\tilde{O}(n^{1/3})$-round distributed algorithm has been constructed by Chang et al.~[SODA 2019, PODC 2019]. Recent works of Eden et al.~[DISC 2019] and of Censor-Hillel et al.~[PODC 2020] have shown sublinear algorithms for $K_p$-listing, for each $p \geq 4$, but still leaving a significant gap between the upper bounds and the known lower bounds of the problem. In this paper, we completely close this gap. We show that for each $p \geq 4$, there is an $\tilde{O}(n^{1 - 2/p})$-round distributed algorithm that lists all $p$-cliques $K_p$ in the communication network. Our algorithm is \emph{optimal} up to a polylogarithmic factor, due to the $\tildeΩ(n^{1 - 2/p})$-round lower bound of Fischer et al.~[SPAA 2018], which holds even in the CONGESTED CLIQUE model. Together with the triangle-listing algorithm by Chang et al.~[SODA 2019, PODC 2019], our result thus shows that the round complexity of $K_p$-listing, for all $p$, is the same in both the CONGEST and CONGESTED CLIQUE models, at $\tildeΘ(n^{1 - 2/p})$ rounds. For $p=4$, our result additionally matches the $\tildeΩ(n^{1/2})$ lower bound for $K_4$-\emph{detection} by Czumaj and Konrad [DISC 2018], implying that the round complexities for detection and listing of $K_4$ are equivalent in the CONGEST model.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Distributed Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted