Detecting Receptivity for mHealth Interventions in the Natural Environment
November 16, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Varun Mishra, Florian KΓΌnzler, Jan-Niklas Kramer, Elgar Fleisch, Tobias Kowatsch, David Kotz
arXiv ID
2011.08302
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
69
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
JITAI is an emerging technique with great potential to support health behavior by providing the right type and amount of support at the right time. A crucial aspect of JITAIs is properly timing the delivery of interventions, to ensure that a user is receptive and ready to process and use the support provided. Some prior works have explored the association of context and some user-specific traits on receptivity, and have built post-study machine-learning models to detect receptivity. For effective intervention delivery, however, a JITAI system needs to make in-the-moment decisions about a user's receptivity. To this end, we conducted a study in which we deployed machine-learning models to detect receptivity in the natural environment, i.e., in free-living conditions. We leveraged prior work regarding receptivity to JITAIs and deployed a chatbot-based digital coach~-- Ally~-- that provided physical-activity interventions and motivated participants to achieve their step goals. We extended the original Ally~app to include two types of machine-learning model that used contextual information about a person to predict when a person is receptive: a \textit{static model\/} that was built before the study started and remained constant for all participants and an \textit{adaptive model\/} that continuously learned the receptivity of individual participants and updated itself as the study progressed. For comparison, we included a \textit{control model\/} that sent intervention messages at random times. The app randomly selected a delivery model for each intervention message. We observed that the machine-learning models led up to a 40\% improvement in receptivity as compared to the control model. Further, we evaluated the temporal dynamics of the different models and observed that receptivity to messages from the adaptive model increased over the course of the study.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted