Tiling with Squares and Packing Dominos in Polynomial Time
November 22, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Symposium on Computational Geometry
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Anders Aamand, Mikkel Abrahamsen, Thomas D. Ahle, Peter M. R. Rasmussen
arXiv ID
2011.10983
Category
cs.CG: Computational Geometry
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
9
Venue
International Symposium on Computational Geometry
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
A polyomino is a polygonal region with axis parallel edges and corners of integral coordinates, which may have holes. In this paper, we consider planar tiling and packing problems with polyomino pieces and a polyomino container $P$. We give two polynomial time algorithms, one for deciding if $P$ can be tiled with $k\times k$ squares for any fixed $k$ which can be part of the input (that is, deciding if $P$ is the union of a set of non-overlapping $k\times k$ squares) and one for packing $P$ with a maximum number of non-overlapping and axis-parallel $2\times 1$ dominos, allowing rotations by $90^\circ$. As packing is more general than tiling, the latter algorithm can also be used to decide if $P$ can be tiled by $2\times 1$ dominos. These are classical problems with important applications in VLSI design, and the related problem of finding a maximum packing of $2\times 2$ squares is known to be NP-Hard [J. Algorithms 1990]. For our three problems there are known pseudo-polynomial time algorithms, that is, algorithms with running times polynomial in the area of $P$. However, the standard, compact way to represent a polygon is by listing the coordinates of the corners in binary. We use this representation, and thus present the first polynomial time algorithms for the problems. Concretely, we give a simple $O(n\log n)$ algorithm for tiling with squares, and a more involved $O(n^3\,\text{polylog}\, n)$ algorithm for packing and tiling with dominos, where $n$ is the number of corners of $P$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computational Geometry
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Dynamic Planar Convex Hull
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
TEMPO: Feature-Endowed TeichmΓΌller Extremal Mappings of Point Clouds
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Manufacturing Cost Estimation and Machining Feature Visualization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Coresets for Clustering in Euclidean Spaces: Importance Sampling is Nearly Optimal
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Momen(e)t: Flavor the Moments in Learning to Classify Shapes
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted