Enhancing deep neural networks with morphological information
November 24, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Natural Language Engineering
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Matej Klemen, Luka Krsnik, Marko Robnik-ล ikonja
arXiv ID
2011.12432
Category
cs.CL: Computation & Language
Citations
16
Venue
Natural Language Engineering
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Deep learning approaches are superior in NLP due to their ability to extract informative features and patterns from languages. The two most successful neural architectures are LSTM and transformers, used in large pretrained language models such as BERT. While cross-lingual approaches are on the rise, most current NLP techniques are designed and applied to English, and less-resourced languages are lagging behind. In morphologically rich languages, information is conveyed through morphology, e.g., through affixes modifying stems of words. Existing neural approaches do not explicitly use the information on word morphology. We analyse the effect of adding morphological features to LSTM and BERT models. As a testbed, we use three tasks available in many less-resourced languages: named entity recognition (NER), dependency parsing (DP), and comment filtering (CF). We construct baselines involving LSTM and BERT models, which we adjust by adding additional input in the form of part of speech (POS) tags and universal features. We compare models across several languages from different language families. Our results suggest that adding morphological features has mixed effects depending on the quality of features and the task. The features improve the performance of LSTM-based models on the NER and DP tasks, while they do not benefit the performance on the CF task. For BERT-based models, the morphological features only improve the performance on DP when they are of high quality while not showing practical improvement when they are predicted. Even for high-quality features, the improvements are less pronounced in language-specific BERT variants compared to massively multilingual BERT models. As in NER and CF datasets manually checked features are not available, we only experiment with predicted features and find that they do not cause any practical improvement in performance.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Computation & Language
๐
๐
Old Age
๐
๐
Old Age
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
๐
๐
Old Age
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
๐
๐
Old Age
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
๐
๐
Old Age
HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted