Average-Case Integrality Gap for Non-Negative Principal Component Analysis

December 03, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Mathematical and Scientific Machine Learning

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Afonso S. Bandeira, Dmitriy Kunisky, Alexander S. Wein arXiv ID 2012.02243 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, math.OC Citations 5 Venue Mathematical and Scientific Machine Learning Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Montanari and Richard (2015) asked whether a natural semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation can effectively optimize $\mathbf{x}^{\top}\mathbf{W} \mathbf{x}$ over $\|\mathbf{x}\| = 1$ with $x_i \geq 0$ for all coordinates $i$, where $\mathbf{W} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ is drawn from the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE) or a spiked matrix model. In small numerical experiments, this SDP appears to be tight for the GOE, producing a rank-one optimal matrix solution aligned with the optimal vector $\mathbf{x}$. We prove, however, that as $n \to \infty$ the SDP is not tight, and certifies an upper bound asymptotically no better than the simple spectral bound $Ξ»_{\max}(\mathbf{W})$ on this objective function. We also provide evidence, using tools from recent literature on hypothesis testing with low-degree polynomials, that no subexponential-time certification algorithm can improve on this behavior. Finally, we present further numerical experiments estimating how large $n$ would need to be before this limiting behavior becomes evident, providing a cautionary example against extrapolating asymptotics of SDPs in high dimension from their efficacy in small "laptop scale" computations.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted