Explainable AI for Interpretable Credit Scoring
December 03, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Lara Marie Demajo, Vince Vella, Alexiei Dingli
arXiv ID
2012.03749
Category
q-fin.RM
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.LG
Citations
48
Venue
Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
With the ever-growing achievements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the recent boosted enthusiasm in Financial Technology (FinTech), applications such as credit scoring have gained substantial academic interest. Credit scoring helps financial experts make better decisions regarding whether or not to accept a loan application, such that loans with a high probability of default are not accepted. Apart from the noisy and highly imbalanced data challenges faced by such credit scoring models, recent regulations such as the `right to explanation' introduced by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) have added the need for model interpretability to ensure that algorithmic decisions are understandable and coherent. An interesting concept that has been recently introduced is eXplainable AI (XAI), which focuses on making black-box models more interpretable. In this work, we present a credit scoring model that is both accurate and interpretable. For classification, state-of-the-art performance on the Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) and Lending Club (LC) Datasets is achieved using the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. The model is then further enhanced with a 360-degree explanation framework, which provides different explanations (i.e. global, local feature-based and local instance-based) that are required by different people in different situations. Evaluation through the use of functionallygrounded, application-grounded and human-grounded analysis show that the explanations provided are simple, consistent as well as satisfy the six predetermined hypotheses testing for correctness, effectiveness, easy understanding, detail sufficiency and trustworthiness.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β q-fin.RM
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Sequential Deep Learning for Credit Risk Monitoring with Tabular Financial Data
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Preference Elicitation and Robust Optimization with Multi-Attribute Quasi-Concave Choice Functions
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Leveraging Convolutional Neural Network-Transformer Synergy for Predictive Modeling in Risk-Based Applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Advanced Risk Prediction and Stability Assessment of Banks Using Time Series Transformer Models
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Every Corporation Owns Its Image: Corporate Credit Ratings via Convolutional Neural Networks
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted