Technical Progress Analysis Using a Dynamic Topic Model for Technical Terms to Revise Patent Classification Codes
December 18, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Mana Iwata, Yoshiro Matsuda, Yoshimasa Utsumi, Yoshitoshi Tanaka, Kazuhide Nakata
arXiv ID
2012.10120
Category
cs.CL: Computation & Language
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
Japanese patents are assigned a patent classification code, FI (File Index), that is unique to Japan. FI is a subdivision of the IPC, an international patent classification code, that is related to Japanese technology. FIs are revised to keep up with technological developments. These revisions have already established more than 30,000 new FIs since 2006. However, these revisions require a lot of time and workload. Moreover, these revisions are not automated and are thus inefficient. Therefore, using machine learning to assist in the revision of patent classification codes (FI) will lead to improved accuracy and efficiency. This study analyzes patent documents from this new perspective of assisting in the revision of patent classification codes with machine learning. To analyze time-series changes in patents, we used the dynamic topic model (DTM), which is an extension of the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA). Also, unlike English, the Japanese language requires morphological analysis. Patents contain many technical words that are not used in everyday life, so morphological analysis using a common dictionary is not sufficient. Therefore, we used a technique for extracting technical terms from text. After extracting technical terms, we applied them to DTM. In this study, we determined the technological progress of the lighting class F21 for 14 years and compared it with the actual revision of patent classification codes. In other words, we extracted technical terms from Japanese patents and applied DTM to determine the progress of Japanese technology. Then, we analyzed the results from the new perspective of revising patent classification codes with machine learning. As a result, it was found that those whose topics were on the rise were judged to be new technologies.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Computation & Language
๐
๐
Old Age
๐
๐
Old Age
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
๐
๐
Old Age
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
๐
๐
Old Age
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
๐
๐
Old Age
HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted