Detecting COVID-19 from Breathing and Coughing Sounds using Deep Neural Networks

December 29, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2021 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors BjΓΆrn W. Schuller, Harry Coppock, Alexander Gaskell arXiv ID 2012.14553 Category cs.SD: Sound Cross-listed cs.LG, eess.AS Citations 72 Venue 2021 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the world unevenly; while industrial economies have been able to produce the tests necessary to track the spread of the virus and mostly avoided complete lockdowns, developing countries have faced issues with testing capacity. In this paper, we explore the usage of deep learning models as a ubiquitous, low-cost, pre-testing method for detecting COVID-19 from audio recordings of breathing or coughing taken with mobile devices or via the web. We adapt an ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks that utilise raw breathing and coughing audio and spectrograms to classify if a speaker is infected with COVID-19 or not. The different models are obtained via automatic hyperparameter tuning using Bayesian Optimisation combined with HyperBand. The proposed method outperforms a traditional baseline approach by a large margin. Ultimately, it achieves an Unweighted Average Recall (UAR) of 74.9%, or an Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) of 80.7% by ensembling neural networks, considering the best test set result across breathing and coughing in a strictly subject independent manner. In isolation, breathing sounds thereby appear slightly better suited than coughing ones (76.1% vs 73.7% UAR).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Sound

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted