Graph-Based Recommendation System Enhanced with Community Detection

January 10, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Scientific Programming

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zeinab Shokrzadeh, Mohammad-Reza Feizi-Derakhshi, Mohammad-Ali Balafar, Jamshid Bagherzadeh-Mohasefi arXiv ID 2201.03622 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CL Citations 2 Venue Scientific Programming Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Many researchers have used tag information to improve the performance of recommendation techniques in recommender systems. Examining the tags of users will help to get their interests and leads to more accuracy in the recommendations. Since user-defined tags are chosen freely and without any restrictions, problems arise in determining their exact meaning and the similarity of tags. However, using thesaurus and ontologies to find the meaning of tags is not very efficient due to their free definition by users and the use of different languages in many data sets. Therefore, this article uses mathematical and statistical methods to determine lexical similarity and co-occurrence tags solution to assign semantic similarity. On the other hand, due to the change of users' interests over time this article has considered the time of tag assignments in co-occurrence tags for determining similarity of tags. Then the graph is created based on similarity of tags. For modeling the interests of the users, the communities of tags are determined by using community detection methods. So, recommendations based on the communities of tags and similarity between resources are done. The performance of the proposed method has been evaluated using two criteria of precision and recall through evaluations on two public datasets. The evaluation results show that the precision and recall of the proposed method have significantly improved, compared to the other methods. According to the experimental results, the criteria of recall and precision have been improved, on average by 5% and 7% respectively.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted