Discovering Personalized Semantics for Soft Attributes in Recommender Systems using Concept Activation Vectors

February 06, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Christina GΓΆpfert, Alex Haig, Yinlam Chow, Chih-wei Hsu, Ivan Vendrov, Tyler Lu, Deepak Ramachandran, Hubert Pham, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Craig Boutilier arXiv ID 2202.02830 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.LG Citations 112 Venue International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Interactive recommender systems have emerged as a promising paradigm to overcome the limitations of the primitive user feedback used by traditional recommender systems (e.g., clicks, item consumption, ratings). They allow users to express intent, preferences, constraints, and contexts in a richer fashion, often using natural language (including faceted search and dialogue). Yet more research is needed to find the most effective ways to use this feedback. One challenge is inferring a user's semantic intent from the open-ended terms or attributes often used to describe a desired item, and using it to refine recommendation results. Leveraging concept activation vectors (CAVs) [26], a recently developed approach for model interpretability in machine learning, we develop a framework to learn a representation that captures the semantics of such attributes and connects them to user preferences and behaviors in recommender systems. One novel feature of our approach is its ability to distinguish objective and subjective attributes (both subjectivity of degree and of sense), and associate different senses of subjective attributes with different users. We demonstrate on both synthetic and real-world data sets that our CAV representation not only accurately interprets users' subjective semantics, but can also be used to improve recommendations through interactive item critiquing.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted