Analysis of a blockchain protocol based on LDPC codes

February 15, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› DLT@ITASEC

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Massimo Battaglioni, Paolo Santini, Giulia Rafaiani, Franco Chiaraluce, Marco Baldi arXiv ID 2202.07265 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.IT Citations 1 Venue DLT@ITASEC Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In a blockchain Data Availability Attack (DAA), a malicious node publishes a block header but withholds part of the block, which contains invalid transactions. Honest full nodes, which can download and store the full blockchain, are aware that some data are not available but they have no formal way to prove it to light nodes, i.e., nodes that have limited resources and are not able to access the whole blockchain data. A common solution to counter these attacks exploits linear error correcting codes to encode the block content. A recent protocol, called SPAR, employs coded Merkle trees and low-density parity-check codes to counter DAAs. In this paper, we show that the protocol is less secure than claimed, owing to a redefinition of the adversarial success probability. As a consequence we show that, for some realistic choices of the parameters, the total amount of data downloaded by light nodes is larger than that obtainable with competitor solutions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted