Practical Testing of a C99 Compiler Using Output Comparison

February 14, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Software, Practice & Experience

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Flash Sheridan arXiv ID 2202.07390 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 42 Venue Software, Practice & Experience Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A simple technique is presented for testing a C99 compiler, by comparison of its output with output from preexisting tools. The advantage to this approach is that new test cases can be added in bulk from existing sources, reducing the need for in-depth investigation of correctness issues, and for creating new test code by hand. This technique was used in testing the PalmSource Palm OS Cobalt ARM C/C++ cross-compiler for Palm-Powered personal digital assistants, primarily for standards-compliance and correct execution of generated code. The technique described here found several hundred bugs, mostly in our in-house code, but also in longstanding high-quality front- and back-end code from Edison Design Group and Apogee Software. It also found eighteen bugs in the GNU C compiler, as well as a bug specific to the Apple version of GCC, a bug specific to the Suse version of GCC, and a dozen bugs in versions of GCC for the ARM processor, several of them critical.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted