Learning physics-informed simulation models for soft robotic manipulation: A case study with dielectric elastomer actuators

February 25, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent RObots and Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Manu Lahariya, Craig Innes, Chris Develder, Subramanian Ramamoorthy arXiv ID 2202.12977 Category cs.RO: Robotics Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 7 Venue IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent RObots and Systems Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Soft actuators offer a safe, adaptable approach to tasks like gentle grasping and dexterous manipulation. Creating accurate models to control such systems however is challenging due to the complex physics of deformable materials. Accurate Finite Element Method (FEM) models incur prohibitive computational complexity for closed-loop use. Using a differentiable simulator is an attractive alternative, but their applicability to soft actuators and deformable materials remains underexplored. This paper presents a framework that combines the advantages of both. We learn a differentiable model consisting of a material properties neural network and an analytical dynamics model of the remainder of the manipulation task. This physics-informed model is trained using data generated from FEM, and can be used for closed-loop control and inference. We evaluate our framework on a dielectric elastomer actuator (DEA) coin-pulling task. We simulate the task of using DEA to pull a coin along a surface with frictional contact, using FEM, and evaluate the physics-informed model for simulation, control, and inference. Our model attains < 5% simulation error compared to FEM, and we use it as the basis for an MPC controller that requires fewer iterations to converge than model-free actor-critic, PD, and heuristic policies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Robotics

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted