Private High-Dimensional Hypothesis Testing
March 03, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Shyam Narayanan
arXiv ID
2203.01537
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.CR,
cs.IT,
cs.LG,
math.ST
Citations
16
Venue
Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We provide improved differentially private algorithms for identity testing of high-dimensional distributions. Specifically, for $d$-dimensional Gaussian distributions with known covariance $Ξ£$, we can test whether the distribution comes from $\mathcal{N}(ΞΌ^*, Ξ£)$ for some fixed $ΞΌ^*$ or from some $\mathcal{N}(ΞΌ, Ξ£)$ with total variation distance at least $Ξ±$ from $\mathcal{N}(ΞΌ^*, Ξ£)$ with $(\varepsilon, 0)$-differential privacy, using only \[\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^{1/2}}{Ξ±^2} + \frac{d^{1/3}}{Ξ±^{4/3} \cdot \varepsilon^{2/3}} + \frac{1}{Ξ±\cdot \varepsilon}\right)\] samples if the algorithm is allowed to be computationally inefficient, and only \[\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^{1/2}}{Ξ±^2} + \frac{d^{1/4}}{Ξ±\cdot \varepsilon}\right)\] samples for a computationally efficient algorithm. We also provide a matching lower bound showing that our computationally inefficient algorithm has optimal sample complexity. We also extend our algorithms to various related problems, including mean testing of Gaussians with bounded but unknown covariance, uniformity testing of product distributions over $\{-1, 1\}^d$, and tolerant testing. Our results improve over the previous best work of Canonne et al.~\cite{CanonneKMUZ20} for both computationally efficient and inefficient algorithms, and even our computationally efficient algorithm matches the optimal \emph{non-private} sample complexity of $O\left(\frac{\sqrt{d}}{Ξ±^2}\right)$ in many standard parameter settings. In addition, our results show that, surprisingly, private identity testing of $d$-dimensional Gaussians can be done with fewer samples than private identity testing of discrete distributions over a domain of size $d$ \cite{AcharyaSZ18}, which refutes a conjectured lower bound of~\cite{CanonneKMUZ20}.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted