Structural Results for High-Multiplicity Scheduling on Uniform Machines

March 03, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hauke Brinkop, David Fischer, Klaus Jansen arXiv ID 2203.01741 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 3 Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Parameterizing by the largest processing time $p_{max}$ and the number of different job processing times $d$, we propose a proximity technique for High-Multiplicity Scheduling on Uniform Machines for the objectives Makespan Minimization ($C_{max}$) and Santa Claus ($C_{min}$) to obtain new structural results for these problems. The novelty in our approach is that we deal with a fractional solution for only a sub-instance, where the sub-instance itself is not known a priori. While the construction and computation of the fractional solution -- in contrast to usual proximity techniques -- is not done in polynomial time, this also allows us to formulate a comparably strong and general proximity statement. Eventually, this allows us to reduce the number of jobs that need to be distributed to a polynomial in $p_{max}$ for each machine and job type, by preassigning jobs according to the fractional solution, essentially returning a bounded number (at most $O(p_{max}^{O(d^2)})$) of kernels, one for each (guessed) sub-instance. We can use our structural results to obtain an algorithm with running time is $p_{max}^{O(d^2)}poly|I|$, matching the best-known so far by Knop et al. (Oper. Res. Lett. '21). Moreover, we propose an $p_{max}^{O(d^2)} poly |I|$ time algorithm for Envy Minimization $C_{envy}$ in the High-Multiplicity Setting on Uniform Machines, showing that this problem is \textsc{fpt} in $p_{max}$. Eventually, we also propose a general mechanism to bound the largest coefficient in the Configuration ILP for so called \emph{Load Balancing Problems} by $(dp_{max})^{O(d)}$, which we hope to be of interest for the development of algorithms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted