Online List Labeling: Breaking the $\log^2n$ Barrier
March 05, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Michael A. Bender, Alex Conway, MartΓn Farach-Colton, Hanna KomlΓ³s, William Kuszmaul, Nicole Wein
arXiv ID
2203.02763
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
7
Venue
IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
The online list labeling problem is an algorithmic primitive with a large literature of upper bounds, lower bounds, and applications. The goal is to store a dynamically-changing set of $n$ items in an array of $m$ slots, while maintaining the invariant that the items appear in sorted order, and while minimizing the relabeling cost, defined to be the number of items that are moved per insertion/deletion. For the linear regime, where $m = (1 + Ξ(1)) n$, an upper bound of $O(\log^2 n)$ on the relabeling cost has been known since 1981. A lower bound of $Ξ©(\log^2 n)$ is known for deterministic algorithms and for so-called smooth algorithms, but the best general lower bound remains $Ξ©(\log n)$. The central open question in the field is whether $O(\log^2 n)$ is optimal for all algorithms. In this paper, we give a randomized data structure that achieves an expected relabeling cost of $O(\log^{3/2} n)$ per operation. More generally, if $m = (1 + \varepsilon) n$ for $\varepsilon = O(1)$, the expected relabeling cost becomes $O(\varepsilon^{-1} \log^{3/2} n)$. Our solution is history independent, meaning that the state of the data structure is independent of the order in which items are inserted/deleted. For history-independent data structures, we also prove a matching lower bound: for all $Ξ΅$ between $1 / n^{1/3}$ and some sufficiently small positive constant, the optimal expected cost for history-independent list-labeling solutions is $Ξ(\varepsilon^{-1}\log^{3/2} n)$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted