Tight Lower Bounds for Approximate & Exact $k$-Center in $\mathbb{R}^d$
March 16, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Symposium on Computational Geometry
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Rajesh Chitnis, Nitin Saurabh
arXiv ID
2203.08328
Category
cs.CG: Computational Geometry
Cross-listed
cs.CC,
cs.DM,
cs.DS
Citations
0
Venue
International Symposium on Computational Geometry
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
In the discrete $k$-center problem, we are given a metric space $(P,\texttt{dist})$ where $|P|=n$ and the goal is to select a set $C\subseteq P$ of $k$ centers which minimizes the maximum distance of a point in $P$ from its nearest center. For any $Ξ΅>0$, Agarwal and Procopiuc [SODA '98, Algorithmica '02] designed an $(1+Ξ΅)$-approximation algorithm for this problem in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space which runs in $O(dn\log k) + \left(\dfrac{k}Ξ΅\right)^{O\left(k^{1-1/d}\right)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ time. In this paper we show that their algorithm is essentially optimal: if for some $d\geq 2$ and some computable function $f$, there is an $f(k)\cdot \left(\dfrac{1}Ξ΅\right)^{o\left(k^{1-1/d}\right)} \cdot n^{o\left(k^{1-1/d}\right)}$ time algorithm for $(1+Ξ΅)$-approximating the discrete $k$-center on $n$ points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space then the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. We obtain our lower bound by designing a gap reduction from a $d$-dimensional constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) defined by Marx and Sidiropoulos [SoCG '14] to discrete $d$-dimensional $k$-center. As a byproduct of our reduction, we also obtain that the exact algorithm of Agarwal and Procopiuc [SODA '98, Algorithmica '02] which runs in $n^{O\left(d\cdot k^{1-1/d}\right)}$ time for discrete $k$-center on $n$ points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space is asymptotically optimal. Formally, we show that if for some $d\geq 2$ and some computable function $f$, there is an $f(k)\cdot n^{o\left(k^{1-1/d}\right)}$ time exact algorithm for the discrete $k$-center problem on $n$ points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space then the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Previously, such a lower bound was only known for $d=2$ and was implicit in the work of Marx [IWPEC '06]. [see paper for full abstract]
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computational Geometry
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Dynamic Planar Convex Hull
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
TEMPO: Feature-Endowed TeichmΓΌller Extremal Mappings of Point Clouds
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Manufacturing Cost Estimation and Machining Feature Visualization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Coresets for Clustering in Euclidean Spaces: Importance Sampling is Nearly Optimal
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Momen(e)t: Flavor the Moments in Learning to Classify Shapes
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted