Coresets for Weight-Constrained Anisotropic Assignment and Clustering

March 21, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Discrete & Computational Geometry

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Maximilian Fiedler, Peter Gritzmann arXiv ID 2203.10864 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed math.OC Citations 4 Venue Discrete & Computational Geometry Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The present paper constructs coresets for weight-constrained anisotropic assignment and clustering. In contrast to the well-studied unconstrained least-squares clustering problem, approximating the centroids of the clusters no longer suffices in the weight-constrained anisotropic case, as even the assignment of the points to best sites is involved. This assignment step is often the limiting factor in materials science, a problem that partially motivates our work. We build on a paper by Har-Peled and Kushal, who constructed coresets of size $\mathcal{O}\bigl(\frac{k^3}{Ξ΅^{d+1}}\bigr)$ for unconstrained least-squares clustering. We generalize and improve on their results in various ways, leading to even smaller coresets with a size of only $\mathcal{O}\bigl(\frac{k^2}{Ξ΅^{d+1}}\bigr)$ for weight-constrained anisotropic clustering. Moreover, we answer an open question on coreset designs in the negative, by showing that the total sensitivity can become as large as the cardinality of the original data set in the constrained case. Consequently, many techniques based on importance sampling do not apply to weight-constrained clustering.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted