Trust and Reliance in XAI -- Distinguishing Between Attitudinal and Behavioral Measures

March 23, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› the CHI 2022 Workshop on Trust and Reliance in AI-Human Teams

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nicolas Scharowski, Sebastian A. C. Perrig, Nick von Felten, Florian BrΓΌhlmann arXiv ID 2203.12318 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 30 Venue the CHI 2022 Workshop on Trust and Reliance in AI-Human Teams Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Trust is often cited as an essential criterion for the effective use and real-world deployment of AI. Researchers argue that AI should be more transparent to increase trust, making transparency one of the main goals of XAI. Nevertheless, empirical research on this topic is inconclusive regarding the effect of transparency on trust. An explanation for this ambiguity could be that trust is operationalized differently within XAI. In this position paper, we advocate for a clear distinction between behavioral (objective) measures of reliance and attitudinal (subjective) measures of trust. However, researchers sometimes appear to use behavioral measures when intending to capture trust, although attitudinal measures would be more appropriate. Based on past research, we emphasize that there are sound theoretical reasons to keep trust and reliance separate. Properly distinguishing these two concepts provides a more comprehensive understanding of how transparency affects trust and reliance, benefiting future XAI research.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted