R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Energy Consumption and Performance of Heapsort in Hardware and Software
April 07, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Maja H. Kirkeby, Thomas Krabben, Mathias Larsen, Maria B. Mikkelsen, Tjark Petersen, Mads Rosendahl, Martin Schoeberl, Martin Sundman
arXiv ID
2204.03401
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
In this poster abstract we will report on a case study on implementing the Heapsort algorithm in hardware and software and comparing their time and energy consumption. Our experiment shows that the Hardware implementation is more energy efficient, but slower than the Software implementation due to a low clock frequency. It also indicate that the optimal degree of parallelization differs when optimizing for time compared to optimizing for time.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted