Energy-Sensitive Trajectory Design and Restoration Areas Allocation for UAV-Enabled Grassland Restoration

April 10, 2022 ยท Declared Dead ยท + Add venue

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Dongbin Jiao, Lingyu Wang, Peng Yang, Weibo Yang, Yu Peng, Zhanhuan Shang, Fengyuan Ren arXiv ID 2204.04666 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Citations 0 Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Grassland restoration is a critical means to safeguard grassland ecological degradation. To alleviate the extensive human labors and boost the restoration efficiency, UAV is promising for its fully automatic capability yet still waits to be exploited. This paper progresses this emerging technology by explicitly considering the realistic constraints of the UAV and the grassland degradation while planning the grassland restoration. To this end, the UAV-enabled restoration process is first mathematically modeled as the maximization of restoration areas of the UAV under the limited battery energy of UAV, the grass seeds weight, the number of restored areas, and the corresponding sizes. Then we analyze that, by considering these constraints, this original problem emerges two conflict objectives, namely the shortest flight path and the optimal areas allocation. As a result, the maximization of restoration areas turns out to be a composite of a trajectory design problem and an areas allocation problem that are highly coupled. From the perspective of optimization, this requires solving two NP-hard problems of both the traveling salesman problem (TSP) and the multidimensional knapsack problem (MKP) at the same time. To tackle this complex problem, we propose a cooperative optimization algorithm, called CHAPBILM, to solve those two problems interlacedly by utilizing the interdependencies between them. Multiple simulations verify the conflicts between the trajectory design and areas allocation. The effectiveness of the cooperative optimization algorithm is also supported by the comparisons with traditional optimization methods which do not utilize the interdependencies between the two problems. As a result, the proposed algorithm successfully solves the multiple simulation instances in a near-optimal way.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Neural & Evolutionary

๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฎ The Ethereal

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE ๐Ÿ› IEEE TNNLS ๐Ÿ“š 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted