Lessons learned from replicating a study on information-retrieval based test case prioritization

April 13, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Software quality journal

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nasir Mehmood Minhas, Mohsin Irshad, Kai Petersen, JΓΌrgen BΓΆrstler arXiv ID 2204.06325 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 1 Venue Software quality journal Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we aim to replicate an artefact-based study on software testing to address the gap. We focus on (a) providing a step by step guide of the replication, reflecting on challenges when replicating artefact-based testing research, (b) Evaluating the replicated study concerning its validity and robustness of the findings. Method: We replicate a test case prioritization technique by Kwon et al. We replicated the original study using four programs, two from the original study and two new programs. The replication study was implemented using Python to support future replications. Results: Various general factors facilitating replications are identified, such as: (1) the importance of documentation; (2) the need of assistance from the original authors; (3) issues in the maintenance of open source repositories (e.g., concerning needed software dependencies); (4) availability of scripts. We also raised several observations specific to the study and its context, such as insights from using different mutation tools and strategies for mutant generation. Conclusion: We conclude that the study by Kwon et al. is replicable for small and medium programs and could be automated to facilitate software practitioners, given the availability of required information.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted