Finding Hall blockers by matrix scaling
April 15, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Mathematics of Operations Research
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Koyo Hayashi, Hiroshi Hirai, Keiya Sakabe
arXiv ID
2204.07425
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
math.CO,
math.OC
Citations
5
Venue
Mathematics of Operations Research
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
For a given nonnegative matrix $A=(A_{ij})$, the matrix scaling problem asks whether $A$ can be scaled to a doubly stochastic matrix $D_1AD_2$ for some positive diagonal matrices $D_1,D_2$.The Sinkhorn algorithm is a simple iterative algorithm, which repeats row-normalization $A_{ij} \leftarrow A_{ij}/\sum_{j}A_{ij}$ and column-normalization $A_{ij} \leftarrow A_{ij}/\sum_{i}A_{ij}$ alternatively. By this algorithm, $A$ converges to a doubly stochastic matrix in limit if and only if the bipartite graph associated with $A$ has a perfect matching. This property can decide the existence of a perfect matching in a given bipartite graph $G$, which is identified with the $0,1$-matrix $A_G$.Linial, Samorodnitsky, and Wigderson showed that $O(n^2 \log n)$ iterations for $A_G$ decide whether $G$ has a perfect matching. Here $n$ is the number of vertices in one of the color classes of $G$. In this paper, we show an extension of this result:If $G$ has no perfect matching, then a polynomial number of the Sinkhorn iterations identifies a Hall blocker -- a vertex subset $X$ having neighbors $Ξ(X)$ with $|X| > |Ξ(X)|$. Specifically, we show that $O(n^2 \log n)$ iterations can identify one Hall blocker, and that further polynomial iterations can also identify all parametric Hall blockers $X$ of maximizing $(1-Ξ») |X| - Ξ»|Ξ(X)|$ for $Ξ»\in [0,1]$.The former result is based on an interpretation of the Sinkhorn algorithm as alternating minimization for geometric programming. The latter is on an interpretation as alternating minimization for KL-divergence (CsiszΓ‘r and TusnΓ‘dy 1984, Gietl and Reffel 2013) and its limiting behavior for a nonscalable matrix (Aas 2014). We also relate the Sinkhorn limit with parametric network flow, principal partition of polymatroids, and the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition of a bipartite graph.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted