Parameterized Sensitivity Oracles and Dynamic Algorithms using Exterior Algebras
April 22, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Josh Alman, Dean Hirsch
arXiv ID
2204.10819
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
3
Venue
International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We design the first efficient sensitivity oracles and dynamic algorithms for a variety of parameterized problems. Our main approach is to modify the algebraic coding technique from static parameterized algorithm design, which had not previously been used in a dynamic context. We particularly build off of the `extensor coding' method of Brand, Dell and Husfeldt [STOC'18], employing properties of the exterior algebra over different fields. For the $k$-Path detection problem for directed graphs, it is known that no efficient dynamic algorithm exists (under popular assumptions from fine-grained complexity). We circumvent this by designing an efficient sensitivity oracle, which preprocesses a directed graph on $n$ vertices in $2^k poly(k) n^{Ο+o(1)}$ time, such that, given $\ell$ updates (mixing edge insertions and deletions, and vertex deletions) to that input graph, it can decide in time $\ell^2 2^kpoly(k)$ and with high probability, whether the updated graph contains a path of length $k$. We also give a deterministic sensitivity oracle requiring $4^k poly(k) n^{Ο+o(1)}$ preprocessing time and $\ell^2 2^{Οk + o(k)}$ query time, and obtain a randomized sensitivity oracle for the task of approximately counting the number of $k$-paths. For $k$-Path detection in undirected graphs, we obtain a randomized sensitivity oracle with $O(1.66^k n^3)$ preprocessing time and $O(\ell^3 1.66^k)$ query time, and a better bound for undirected bipartite graphs. In addition, we present the first fully dynamic algorithms for a variety of problems: $k$-Partial Cover, $m$-Set $k$-Packing, $t$-Dominating Set, $d$-Dimensional $k$-Matching, and Exact $k$-Partial Cover. For example, for $k$-Partial Cover we show a randomized dynamic algorithm with $2^k poly(k)polylog(n)$ update time, and a deterministic dynamic algorithm with $4^kpoly(k)polylog(n)$ update time.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted