SciEv: Finding Scientific Evidence Papers for Scientific News

April 30, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Md Reshad Ul Hoque, Jiang Li, Jian Wu arXiv ID 2205.00126 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 2 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the past decade, many scientific news media that report scientific breakthroughs and discoveries emerged, bringing science and technology closer to the general public. However, not all scientific news article cites proper sources, such as original scientific papers. A portion of scientific news articles contain misinterpreted, exaggerated, or distorted information that deviates from facts asserted in the original papers. Manually identifying proper citations is laborious and costly. Therefore, it is necessary to automatically search for pertinent scientific papers that could be used as evidence for a given piece of scientific news. We propose a system called SciEv that searches for scientific evidence papers given a scientific news article. The system employs a 2-stage query paradigm with the first stage retrieving candidate papers and the second stage reranking them. The key feature of SciEv is it uses domain knowledge entities (DKEs) to find candidates in the first stage, which proved to be more effective than regular keyphrases. In the reranking stage, we explore different document representations for news articles and candidate papers. To evaluate our system, we compiled a pilot dataset consisting of 100 manually curated (news,paper) pairs from ScienceAlert and similar websites. To our best knowledge, this is the first dataset of this kind. Our experiments indicate that the transformer model performs the best for DKE extraction. The system achieves a P@1=50%, P@5=71%, and P@10=74% when it uses a TFIDF-based text representation. The transformer-based re-ranker achieves a comparable performance but costs twice as much time. We will collect more data and test the system for user experience.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted