KQGC: Knowledge Graph Embedding with Smoothing Effects of Graph Convolutions for Recommendation

May 23, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Daisuke Kikuta, Toyotaro Suzumura, Md Mostafizur Rahman, Yu Hirate, Satyen Abrol, Manoj Kondapaka, Takuma Ebisu, Pablo Loyola arXiv ID 2205.12102 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 2 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Leveraging graphs on recommender systems has gained popularity with the development of graph representation learning (GRL). In particular, knowledge graph embedding (KGE) and graph neural networks (GNNs) are representative GRL approaches, which have achieved the state-of-the-art performance on several recommendation tasks. Furthermore, combination of KGE and GNNs (KG-GNNs) has been explored and found effective in many academic literatures. One of the main characteristics of GNNs is their ability to retain structural properties among neighbors in the resulting dense representation, which is usually coined as smoothing. The smoothing is specially desired in the presence of homophilic graphs, such as the ones we find on recommender systems. In this paper, we propose a new model for recommender systems named Knowledge Query-based Graph Convolution (KQGC). In contrast to exisiting KG-GNNs, KQGC focuses on the smoothing, and leverages a simple linear graph convolution for smoothing KGE. A pre-trained KGE is fed into KQGC, and it is smoothed by aggregating neighbor knowledge queries, which allow entity-embeddings to be aligned on appropriate vector points for smoothing KGE effectively. We apply the proposed KQGC to a recommendation task that aims prospective users for specific products. Extensive experiments on a real E-commerce dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of KQGC.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted